Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:24

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Weird-shaped notebooks make me want to write again - The Verge
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Where the Stock Market Stands Now After a Wild Start to the Year - Bloomberg.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Can you write a poem or short story based on the first image that shows up on Pinterest?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
I replaced my notes app with ChatGPT — here’s how it upgraded my productivity - Tom's Guide
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Wine-Based Hangover Project Drops QEMU In Favor Of FEX & Box64 For Emulation - Phoronix
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Europe stock markets fall after Trump doubles steel tariffs - CNBC
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the rudest/meanest thing a family member has said to you?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?